π Share this article Russia Seeks Staggering Amount in Compensation from Euroclear over Frozen Assets Russia's monetary authority has declared it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state funds to support Ukraine. The Substantial Demand Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim. European Union officials are set to determine later this week on a plan to use around β¬210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and economic stability. The vast majority of these funds, amounting to β¬185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves. Divergent Legal Views EU authorities have argued that their proposal is legally sound. They argue is based on the fact that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. It has threatened reciprocal measures, including seizing European corporate holdings within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal. Strategic Positioning In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States." The clearing house declined to comment on the new legal action. It has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts. Enforcement Challenges While judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant holdings can be located," stated a legal expert from an international firm. European Safeguards EU officials said they are working on measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation." How the Funding Would Work Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first β¬90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched. Kyiv would only be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war. Alternative Proposals Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget. This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition. Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also delivers a clear message that when you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."