🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.