🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming little “sweetheart”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a sizeable but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a struggle between a defunct facility, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned debate over their future often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the people who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept threatened to end their lives unless the federal government pays for the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and group interactions suggest they are remarkably smart creatures – something one caretaker learned directly.

Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a position that entailed building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so surprised by the details and quirks in their characters. She cultivated a particular love for two female belugas with contrasting personalities.

“One whale accepted me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “They altered the way I perceive bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Her relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her time at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the facility ascribes to age-related causes, but which activists say reflects the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The facility did not admit visitors to the guests over the recent season, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the shutdown. “Concrete is breaking off from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and move about with pieces in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality health care and constant care than any human in the UK, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the facility in recent months following the death of a beluga, an ailing beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the facility thought information of the death were shared to the media and she was released soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any plans to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “immense personnel”, vehicles and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She backs calls for the whales to be taken promptly from the park, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official denied a request to transfer the whales to China.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a ongoing situation in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the minister wrote. “As the public, we know that belugas belong in the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing approve an export that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s comments reflect a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The public needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers attempt to find a answer, ideas have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of nourishment for local populations.

A proposed refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has been highly debated. The future site, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a permanent solution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible solution in the coming months.

An official, director of the sanctuary project, said the location will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales get from specialists, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|